top of page
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
Tim Nangle
172841827328423.PNG

Senator Tim Nangle's failed leadership and reckless far-left policy decisions on critical issues are having a detrimental impact on the lives of Maine's residents. His inability to effectively address the state's pressing concerns has led to negative consequences, undermining the well-being of the community and compromising Maine's future prosperity.


 

- **Opposition to Senior Property Tax Relief**: Nangle opposed measures aimed at providing property tax relief for seniors. This position has been criticized for neglecting the financial needs of elderly residents who are struggling with increased living costs, highlighting a lack of leadership in addressing the concerns of vulnerable populations ([Maine Legislature Records](https://legislature.maine.gov/records/senate-record), [Maine Public](https://www.mainepublic.org/politics/2023-07-03/lawmakers-to-vote-on-900m-spending-bill-that-replaces-senior-tax-freeze-program)).

 

- **Support for Lenient Immigration Policies**: Nangle has supported far-left policies that provide access to a wide variety of state services for undocumented immigrants, reflecting a lenient approach that incentivizes illegal immigration. This policy stance has been viewed as reckless and as a failure to prioritize public resources for legal residents ([Maine Legislature Bill Information](https://legislature.maine.gov/legis/bills)). 

 

- **Promotion of Costly Green Energy Initiatives**: Nangle has championed green energy initiatives that place a significant financial burden on taxpayers while disproportionately benefiting select industries. His extreme far-left approach has been labeled as economically reckless, with inadequate consideration of the broader impact on Maine residents' energy costs and financial stability ([Maine Legislature Green Energy Votes](https://legislature.maine.gov/legis/bills), [Maine Public](www.mainepublic.org/politics/2023-07-07/after-intense-debate-and-lobbying-lawmakers-approve-tweaks-to-solar-subsidies)).

 

- **Support for Gender-Affirming Care for Minors**: Senator Nangle endorsed bills which mandate that MaineCare provide coverage for gender-affirming care, including treatments for gender dysphoria. This promotes irreversible medical procedures for minors without adequate safeguards, reflecting a reckless approach to sensitive healthcare issues ([Maine Legislature PDF](https://legislature.maine.gov/legis/bills/getPDF.asp?paper=HP0676&item=1&snum=131)).

 

- **Backing Full-Term Abortion Policies**: Nangle has supported legislation that allows abortions up to the point of birth, removes the criminal penalties for performing an abortion without being licensed as a medical professional, and for performing an abortion after viability of the fetus when it is not necessary for the preservation of the life or health of the mother. This stance has been criticized for undermining protections for unborn children, showcasing failed leadership on critical ethical issues ([Maine Legislature Statutes](https://legislature.maine.gov/statutes/22/title22sec1598.html), [Title 22, §1598: Abortions](https://legislature.maine.gov/statutes/22/title22sec1598.html), [131st Maine Legislature](getPDF.asp (maine.gov)).

Jane Pringle
1728414736028877.PNG

Representative Jane Pringle consistently prioritizes far-left policies that fail to align with the needs and concerns of Maine's residents. Her approach often ignores the practical challenges facing the community, leading to frustration and a lack of confidence in her ability to effectively advocate for Maine's population.

- **High Party Alignment**: Pringle's voting record shows she voted with the Democrat majority in the Maine House of Representatives 91.2% of the time during the 2023 First Special Session. This level of alignment indicates minimal independence and a lack of representation for constituents with differing views ([Member Voting Statistics](https://legislature.maine.gov/house/house/Repository/Documents/131/MemberVotingStats/Pringle,%20J.P.%20(D).pdf), [LD 1253, HP 801, Text and Status, 131st Legislature, First Special Session](https://legislature.maine.gov/legis/bills/display_ps.asp?LD=1253&snum=131)).

 

- **Neglect of Senior Property Tax Relief**: Pringle's vote against proposed amendments for expanding property tax relief for seniors indicates a failure to prioritize the financial needs of elderly residents, raising concerns about her responsiveness to their challenges ([Voting Report](https://legislature.maine.gov/house/house/Repository/Documents/131/RollCalls/028.248.131S1.pdf)).

 

- **Support for Sanctuary Policies**: Her votes in favor of sanctuary policies for undocumented immigrants are undermining law enforcement and placing additional burdens on taxpayers, which could lead to community tensions ([Voting Report](https://legislature.maine.gov/house/house/Repository/Documents/131/RollCalls/028.248.131S1.pdf)).

 

- **Opposition to Hospital Price Transparency**: By voting "Ought Not to Pass" on LD 953, which aimed to enhance hospital price transparency, Pringle raises concerns about her commitment to healthcare access and affordability. This vote prioritized other interests over patient needs ([LD 953, HP 600, Text and Status, 131st Legislature, First Special Session](https://legislature.maine.gov/legis/bills/display_ps.asp?LD=953&snum=131)).

 

- **Failure to Support Insurance Market Stability**: Pringle aligned with the Democrat majority to reject LD 1253, which sought to maintain the integrity of individual and small-group health insurance markets. This rejection suggests a lack of support for necessary reforms that could stabilize healthcare coverage in Maine ([LD 1253, HP 801, Text and Status, 131st Legislature, First Special Session](https://legislature.maine.gov/legis/bills/display_ps.asp?LD=1253&snum=131)).

 

- **Backing Costly Green Energy Policies**: Pringle's support for aggressive green energy initiatives, including increased subsidies and mandates for renewable energy projects, has been driving up costs for consumers and negatively impacting Maine's economy ([Voting Report](https://legislature.maine.gov/house/house/Repository/Documents/131/RollCalls/028.248.131S1.pdf), [Maine Wire] (https://www.themainewire.com/))

 

- **Support for Full-Term Abortion**: Pringle has consistently voted in favor of expanding abortion rights, including support for bills allowing full-term abortions up to the point of viability and beyond, removing the criminal penalties for performing an abortion without being licensed as a medical professional, and for performing an abortion after viability of the fetus when it is not necessary for the preservation of the life or health of the mother. This extreme position on reproductive rights does not reflect the views of many constituents ([Voting Report](https://legislature.maine.gov/house/house/Repository/Documents/131/RollCalls/028.248.131S1.pdf)).

 

- **Endorsement of Gender-Affirming Care for Minors**: By supporting the bills that required MaineCare to reimburse for gender-affirming care for minors, Pringle is undermining parental rights and endorsing irreversible medical treatments for children. This legislation has led to life-altering decisions being made at a young age, without adequate safeguards to protect both children and parents. Serious concerns have been raised about the psychological and physical risks associated with such treatments, with critics questioning whether minors are capable of fully understanding the long-term implications([Voting Report](https://legislature.maine.gov/house/house/Repository/Documents/131/RollCalls/028.248.131S1.pdf), [Title 22, §3174-MMM: Coverage for gender-affirming care](https://legislature.maine.gov/statutes/22/title22sec3174-MMM.html)).

Patrick Corey
17290249911523728.png

Patrick Corey's voting record reveals a pattern of opposition to core conservative principles, aligning him more closely with far-left initiatives and raising questions about his commitment to the needs and values of his constituents. This inconsistency has led to growing concerns among voters regarding his reliability as a representative of conservative values.

 

-**Raising Your Electricity Rates**: Former Representative Patrick Corey co-sponsored LD 1711, forcing solar energy on Mainers, which has led to higher electricity costs. The bill mandated long-term contracts between utilities and solar developers, with substantial costs for upgrading infrastructure, which are passed on to consumers. The Public Utilities Commission required millions in additional resources, resulting in increased utility rates for Maine residents. This bill disproportionately burdened ratepayers with higher energy bills leaving Mainers struggling to get by ([LD 1711 An Act To Promote Solar Energy Projects and Distributed Generation Resources in Maine]

https://legislature.maine.gov/legis/bills/bills_129th/billtexts/SP056501.asp), (https://legiscan.com/ME/bill/LD1711/2019), (https://www.mainelegislature.org/legis/bills/bills_129th/fiscalpdfs/FN171104.pdf), [The Maine Anchor](http://themaineanchor.news/maine-electric-rates-legislative-failures-and-consumer-burden), [The Windham Eagle](http://columnists.thewindhameagle.com))

 

-**Hurt Mainers by Pushing Expensive Climate Policies**: Patrick Corey co-sponsored LD 1679 (SP 550), a bill that created the Maine Climate Change Council to implement broad climate change initiatives. While aimed at combating climate change, this bill led to costly regulations and policies that increased expenses for businesses and consumers alike. The financial burden of complying with stricter environmental mandates has been passed down to Mainers through higher costs of goods and services, making it more difficult for working families to make ends meet. Corey's backing of these green policies, without fully considering their economic impacts, has left many Maine residents struggling financially

([Maine Legislature] (https://www.mainelegislature.org/LawMakerWeb/sponsors.asp?ID=280073696), (https://www.mainelegislature.org/LawMakerWeb/rollcall.asp?ID=280073696&chamber=House&serialnumber=209), (https://www.mainelegislature.org/legis/bills/getPDF.asp?paper=SP0550&item=3&snum=129)).

 

- **Support for Increased Government Spending**: Corey consistently voted during budget deliberations to increase government spending. This approach raised alarms among fiscal conservatives who believe in a leaner government, suggesting a departure from traditional conservative values ([The Maine Monitor](https://themainemonitor.org/legislature-produces-results-with-work-on-climate-change-initiatives/), [Maine Republican Party](https://www.mainegop.com/), [MainePolicyInstitute](https://www.mainepolicy.org/)).

 

- **Environmental Over Regulation**: His votes in favor of certain environmental regulations were viewed negatively by many who argued that these measures would impose unnecessary burdens on businesses and stifle economic growth. His stance shows a misguided prioritization of over-regulation over economic interests ([Maine Conservation Voters](https://www.maineconservationvoters.org/), [MaineBiz](https://www.mainebiz.biz/)[Maine Legislature] (https://www.mainelegislature.org/LawMakerWeb/sponsors.asp?ID=280073696), (https://www.mainelegislature.org/LawMakerWeb/rollcall.asp?ID=280073696&chamber=House&serialnumber=209), (https://www.mainelegislature.org/legis/bills/getPDF.asp?paper=SP0550&item=3&snum=129)).

Doris Poland
17283867562321439.PNG

Doris Poland's candidacy reflects a commitment to far-left policies that have generated significant criticism. Her alignment with controversial education reforms, lack of focus on fiscal responsibility, and opposition to parental rights in education are points of contention among constituents who are concerned about the potential implications for their community.



 

- **Alignment with Far-Left Policies**: Doris Poland has demonstrated strong support for extreme-left initiatives, including expansive welfare programs and increased government spending. Her policies will lead to higher taxes and increased financial strain on Maine residents, especially those in lower-income brackets ([Maine Public](https://www.mainepublic.org/), [Portland Press Herald](https://www.pressherald.com/)).

 

- **Opposition to Fiscal Responsibility**: Poland's record indicates a tendency to oppose measures aimed at budget cuts and fiscal restraint. This approach has led some constituents to question her commitment to responsible government spending, raising concerns about potential long-term fiscal implications for the district ([Bangor Daily News](https://www.bangordailynews.com/), [Maine Policy Institute](https://www.mainepolicy.org/)).

 

- **Support for Controversial Education Policies**: Poland has backed educational reforms that prioritize political correctness over traditional educational values. Her advocacy for controversial comprehensive sex education and social justice curricula has sparked backlash from parents who feel these topics should be approached more conservatively or left to families ([WMTW News](https://www.wmtw.com/), [Maine Families for Education](https://www.mainefamiliesforeducation.org/)).

 

- **Resistance to Parental Rights in Education**: She has opposed initiatives that aim to enhance parental involvement in the educational decision-making process. Many parents express concern that her stance undermines their rights to have a say in their children's education, particularly regarding controversial subjects ([Maine Education Association](https://www.maineea.org/), [Windham Eagle](https://www.windhameagle.com/)).

 

- **Environmental Policy Stance**: Poland has endorsed aggressive environmental regulations that some believe could adversely affect Maine’s economy, particularly in sectors like fishing and logging. Her approach fails to strike a balance between environmental protection and economic viability ([Maine Center for Economic Policy](https://www.mecep.org/), [Maine Audubon](https://www.maineaudubon.org/)).

David Nadeau
1728417192170522.PNG

David Nadeau's voting record suggests a pattern of decisions that do not align with the priorities of many Windham residents. His support for controversial policies and alignment with far-left measures have sparked concerns about his commitment to fiscal responsibility, public safety, local businesses, and the overall well-being of the community.

 

- **Opposition to Fiscal Responsibility**: Councilor Nadeau has frequently voted against budgetary measures aimed at reducing spending and controlling local taxes. Critics argue that his stance could lead to increased financial burdens on Windham residents, undermining efforts to maintain fiscal responsibility within the town government ([Windham Eagle](https://www.windhameagle.com/), [Maine Policy Institute](https://www.mainepolicy.org/)).

 

- **Support for Controversial Development Projects**: Nadeau has voted in favor of several contentious development projects that many residents believe threaten the town’s character and natural resources. His support for these developments has raised concerns among community members about their long-term impact on Windham ([Mainebiz](https://www.mainebiz.biz/), [Portland Press Herald](https://www.pressherald.com/)).

 

- **Alignment with Far-Left Policies**: Nadeau's voting record reflects a tendency to align with policies that include increased, burdensome regulations on local businesses. These policies stifle economic growth and job creation in the area, raising questions about his commitment to supporting the local economy ([Windham Town Council Minutes](https://www.windhammaine.us/), [Bangor Daily News](https://bangordailynews.com/)).

 

- **Opposition to Law Enforcement Funding**: He has been part of council votes against increased funding for local law enforcement. This decision has been met with backlash from constituents who feel that public safety should be a top priority, and who believe in adequately supporting police forces ([Maine State Police](https://www.maine.gov/dps/msp/), [News Center Maine](https://www.newscentermaine.com/)).

 

- **Environment Over Economy**: Nadeau has consistently supported stringent environmental regulations that place undue burdens on local businesses. His environmental priorities come at the expense of economic development and job opportunities for Windham residents ([Maine Conservation Voters](https://www.maineconservationvoters.org/), [Mainebiz](https://www.mainebiz.biz/)).

 

- **Divergence on Education Funding**: Nadeau has voted against proposals aimed at increasing funding for local schools, drawing criticism from parents and educators who argue that investing in education is crucial for the community’s future ([Maine Department of Education](https://www.maine.gov/doe/), [Maine Education Association](https://www.maineea.org/)).

Jessica Bridges
1728410882258673.PNG

Jessica Bridges' voting record and policy positions as an RSU 14

School Board member indicate a pattern of decisions that Windham residents view as out of step with their values and priorities. Her support for controversial educational policies and her lack of focus on accountability and parental involvement have led to significant criticism from the community.

 

- **Alignment with Far-Left Education Policies**: Jessica Bridges has consistently supported extreme-left education policies, including those that promote comprehensive sex education and social-emotional learning. These initiatives do not align with the values of many Windham families and undermine parental rights in education ([Maine Policy Institute](https://www.mainepolicy.org/), [Bangor Daily News](https://bangordailynews.com/)).

 

- **Opposition to Parental Input**: Bridges has voted against measures that would increase parental involvement in school curricula. This stance has raised concerns among parents who feel that their voices should be prioritized in decisions affecting their children's education ([Windham Eagle](https://www.windhameagle.com/), [Maine Parent](https://www.maineparent.com/)).

 

- **Support for Controversial Curriculum Changes**: She has endorsed curriculum changes that include topics that parents deem inappropriate for school-aged children. This has led to protests and calls for accountability from constituents who believe such subjects should not be taught in public schools without parental consent ([Portland Press Herald](https://www.pressherald.com/), [Maine Family Policy Council](https://www.mainefamilypolicycouncil.org/)).

 

- **Funding for Unproven Programs**: Bridges has voted in favor of funding initiatives that have yet to demonstrate effectiveness in improving student outcomes. This misallocation of resources detracts from essential educational services and programs that are proven to work ([Maine Department of Education](https://www.maine.gov/doe/), [Maine Center for Economic Policy](https://www.mecep.org/)).

 

- **Resistance to Performance Accountability**: She has shown reluctance to implement accountability measures for teachers and administrators, which some stakeholders believe is essential for ensuring high standards in education. This has sparked concerns about the overall quality of education within the district ([Windham Town Council Minutes](https://www.windhammaine.us/), [Maine Education Association](https://www.maineea.org/)).

 

- **Dismissal of Traditional Values**: Bridges’ votes and statements often dismiss traditional educational values, leading to discontent among constituents who feel that their perspectives are not being considered. This attitude alienates community members who prioritize foundational educational principles ([Maine Families for Education](https://www.mainefamiliesforeducation.org/), [WMTW News](https://www.wmtw.com/))

bottom of page