top of page

Concerns About the Proposed $19 Million Middle School Renovation

Writer: David Brinkman
David Brinkman
Sep 22
2 min read
proposed $19 million Middle School community-center renovation

The proposed $19 million Middle School community-center renovation raises serious concerns about cost, necessity, and long-term planning. The town’s facilities are functional, and tax dollars should be spent on major projects only when they are truly necessary. The Department of Education’s sprinkler and roof upgrades should be completed directly rather than through a far more expensive full renovation.


Consider moving Manchester students into the Middle School and repurposing Manchester School for town use. Field Allen could be incorporated into the larger campus, reducing transportation costs and the inefficiencies of operating split schools. Older Manchester and Field Allen facilities may eventually require DOE upgrades or replacement—costs that would come on top of the $19 million renovation and the new Middle School.


Manchester School is centrally located downtown, accessible to residents and businesses, has no bearing walls, and would be far less expensive to renovate. It could reduce Route 302 congestion, eliminate multiple daily bus entries and exits, and make the fields more accessible. Keeping schools on the same campus also makes long-term logistical and financial sense by reducing busing expenses, including fuel, labor, maintenance, and depreciation.


Taxpayers should not be asked to absorb unnecessary costs for projects that may be attractive but are not practical, cost-effective, or essential. The Middle School is in better condition than many town school buildings, and the cost of sprinkler upgrades would be far below $19 million. Other potential benefits include improved parking, separate campuses, fewer conflicts over field use, better walk-and-bike access, and greater access for the Chamber and WEDC, as well as year-round community use.


Pickleball courts would have limited year-round use in Maine’s climate, making it difficult to justify asking already-stretched taxpayers to fund amenities that may be used infrequently. The vacant fire station could instead be sold to a private sports venue, golf simulator, or restaurant and bar, generating tax revenue.


Before the November vote, residents should ask whether the Town fully reviewed other options. Many believe the Town and RSU moved too quickly in promoting a $1 sale and appointing a committee without adequately considering less expensive and more beneficial alternatives.


David Brinkman 

Mill Pond


Comments


2026

bottom of page